BOOK A DEMO
See how the world's leading legal teams are building the future of in-house legal.
ARTICLE
Private capital legal teams handle enormous document-heavy workloads during fundraises and closes. Discover how AI agents can automate side-letter reviews, MFN matrixing, and due diligence, freeing lawyers to focus on critical decisions.
Private capital legal teams deal with an enormous amount of document-heavy work around every fundraise, investment and close.
Side letters have to be reconciled. Subscription documents and shareholder agreements need to be checked carefully against the firm's positions. Data rooms can contain hundreds of documents, all of which need to be understood before an investment decision is made.
Much of this work requires legal knowledge, but not every part requires a lawyer to do it manually.
That is where agents can help.
An agent can take on a complete piece of work rather than simply answering a question. It can read the relevant documents, work through the steps your team has defined, produce the output you need and send anything requiring judgment to the right lawyer.
It does this using a few building blocks your team sets up once: repositories that hold your documents, playbooks that hold your agreed positions, and reports that lay a stack of paper out as a single structured view.
The lawyer remains responsible for the decision. The agent takes care of the work around it.
Here are three examples of what that looks like across the private capital lifecycle.
Side letters are a familiar part of a fund close. Different investors negotiate different rights, and those rights then need to be understood alongside the LPA and any most-favored-nation provisions.
As the number of investors grows, so does the amount of comparison required.
An agent can start working as soon as a side letter is signed.
Drawing on a repository of your executed side letters, the LPA and the fund's existing positions, it reads the new agreement against them and pulls each negotiated term into a single report: one structured table, with a row for every side letter. From there, it can work through the investor base and identify which investors may be entitled to elect particular terms, which provisions are excluded from MFN treatment, and where something needs closer legal review.
Rather than deciding those questions itself, the agent can be instructed to send anything unclear to a lawyer.
Once the analysis is complete, it can run a drafting skill to prepare each election notice for review.
The result is a much clearer picture of the obligations created across the investor base. The legal team can see where each right came from, how it was treated and what ultimately went to investors, without having to rebuild that history after the close.
Private capital teams regularly receive documents drafted by another party, whether that is a subscription agreement, shareholders' agreement or investment management agreement.
The challenge is not simply identifying unusual language. Often the important question is whether the document contains everything your firm expects it to contain.
An agent can review incoming documents against a playbook: the positions your team already uses, written down as a set of rules.
For example, it can check information rights, MFN provisions, approval requirements and other terms against those agreed standards. Where something expected is missing, it can flag the absence just as it would flag an unacceptable clause.
It can also draw on a repository of agreements your team has reviewed before, so a new document is measured the way similar ones were handled in the past.
Certain areas can be deliberately kept with a lawyer. Fees and expenses, for example, might always be extracted and presented for human review rather than accepted or changed automatically.
The agent can then prepare the materials the team needs to move the document forward: a clause-by-clause report, a proposed redline and concise notes explaining the issues that may matter to the investment committee.
Anything outside the team's agreed position can be routed directly to the GC or another named lawyer.
The benefit is not replacing legal review. It is giving every document the same thorough first pass, while allowing lawyers to spend their attention on the provisions where their judgment matters.
A large data room can contain hundreds or thousands of documents, and understanding what is inside it is often one of the first major pieces of work in a transaction.
An agent can take on much of that initial review.
Give it access to the data room and it can work through the documents against a repository of the diligence checklists your team already uses. It can organize what it finds into a report: a structured table that captures the relevant contractual terms, the risks and the questions still to be answered, a row at a time.
It can also follow the relationships between documents.
Where an agreement has been amended several times, for example, the agent can group the amendments with the original agreement in that report, rather than treating each document separately.
From that work, it can prepare a diligence report in the format your investment committee expects, with the underlying source attached to each finding. Material issues can be brought to the top, while everything else remains indexed and available for the team to examine.
That gives the legal and investment teams an earlier view of what is in the room. Lawyers can focus quickly on the issues that may affect the deal, rather than spending the first part of the process simply getting through the documents.
The important part is that none of these agents needs to invent its own standard.
They work from what your team already has: your repositories of documents, the playbooks that hold your positions, and the checklists and approval rules you use every day.
You decide what the agent can handle, what always needs a lawyer and who has final sign-off. Every piece of work can also be recorded, so the team can see what was reviewed, what was flagged and how a decision was reached.
For private capital teams, that opens up a different way to think about repetitive legal work.
Not removing lawyers from the process, but giving them a way to move through far more of it without spending their time on every individual step.
The honest test is a live document. Talk to the team, and we will put one of these to work on a real side-letter set, a piece of inbound paper, or a repository of documents.
And if you would rather learn how these are built, or build one yourself alongside other practitioners, join the Legal Engineering Project, our Slack community for legal engineering, created by Elly Meenan, one of our founding legal engineers.
Lawyers live in Word. Wordsmith works there too. Review, redline, draft, research, and translate without ever leaving the document in front of you.
Global legal intelligence built around your business, hundreds of trusted sources across 130+ jurisdictions, combined with deep knowledge of your entities, risk profile, and prior positions.
Chain drafting into a full end-to-end workflow. Receive the request, draft the document, route for approval, and send. No manual step required.
